Finkel v. Frattarelli Bros., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that attorneys appearing before the Eastern District of New York are bound by the New York State Rules of Professional Conduct
• finding that attorneys appearing before the Eastern District of New York are bound by the New York State Rules of Professional Conduct
• finding that the prejudice prong could not be met where \there is no reason to believe that counsel's testimony would be inconsistent with their clients' account of the facts\
• collecting cases and explaining that “disqualification is not appropriate” when “counsel’s testimony would be merely cumulative of testimony provided by others”
• \Speculation as to the testimony that counsel would give is not sufficient to support a motion to disqualify.\
• “Where counsel’s testimony would be merely cumulative of testimony provided by others, disqualification is not appropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).