· 4/25/2002
Fink v. Printed Circuit Corp.
Citations
- 204 F. Supp. 2d 119
- 13 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 367
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8985
- 2002 WL 1021364
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that evidence that the plaintiff’s illness “substantially limited his ability to sleep and think” was sufficient to allow the disability question to be decided by a jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gorton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.