Skip to main content
· 4/25/2002

Fink v. Printed Circuit Corp.

Citations

  • 204 F. Supp. 2d 119
  • 13 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 367
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8985
  • 2002 WL 1021364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence that the plaintiff’s illness “substantially limited his ability to sleep and think” was sufficient to allow the disability question to be decided by a jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gorton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.