Fink v. New York City Department of Personnel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]here is no provision requiring the employer to take ac count of the disabled individual’s preferences in choosing the means of accommodation ... [s]o long as the means chosen allow the individual to compete, the employer satisfies his legal obligation”
• “The government is not obligated under [the Rehabilitation Act] to provide plaintiff with every accommodation he may request, but only with reasonable accommodation as is necessary to enable him to perform his essential functions.” (internal quotation marks omitted) (alteration in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).