Fink v. Gonzalez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “application of this privilege to the investigators’ notes . . . is a poor fit”
• “[T]he proper scope of discovery in any case is a function of the nature of that case.”
• “To extend the deliberative process privilege to a recommendation as to a particular personnel matter extends it beyond its present form to protect from disclosure what would otherwise be evidence relevant to a plaintiff’s complaint of discrimination.”
• “Evidence that the defendant treated persons similarly situated differently may be relevant evidence of racial discrimination. Information that may permit such a comparison is ‘reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery’ of relevant evidence. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1
• “Evidence that the defendant treated persons similarly situated differently may be relevant evidence of racial discrimination. Information that may permit such a comparison is ‘reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery’ of relevant evidence. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1
• ordering production of certain responsive documents from personnel files

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).