Skip to main content
· 9/22/2005

Fink v. Chao

Citations

  • 395 F. Supp. 2d 625
  • 2005 WL 2319494

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The fact that DOL employees may have given Fink erroneous advice is irrelevant. There is no equitable estoppel against the government.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.