· 9/22/2005
Fink v. Chao
Citations
- 395 F. Supp. 2d 625
- 2005 WL 2319494
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The fact that DOL employees may have given Fink erroneous advice is irrelevant. There is no equitable estoppel against the government.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.