Finger v. Omni Publications International., Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• arguing that the photographs at issue in Finger were not 'substantially fictionalized' like the ones at issue in Fils-Aime, Thompson v. Close-Up, Inc., 277 A.D. 848, 98 N.Y.S.2d 300, 301 (1950
• arguing that the photographs at issue in Finger were not 'substantially fictionalized' like the ones at issue in Fils-Aime, Thompson v. Close-Up, Inc., 277 A.D. 848, 98 N.Y.S.2d 300, 301 (1950), and Metzger v. Dell Publishing, 207 Misc. 182, 136 N.Y.S.2d 888, 891 (1955)
• noting that “the ‘newsworthiness exception’ should be liberally applied”
• photograph of adults and children newsworthy where used to illustrate magazine article
• “real relationship” between photograph of plaintiffs family and article on caffeine-aided in vitro fertilization, even where none of plaintiffs children had been conceived by in vitro fertilization and plaintiff had not participated in caffeine-aided fertility project

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).