Skip to main content
· 7/11/1894

Fingal v. Millvale Boro.

Citations

  • 162 Pa. 393
  • 29 A. 644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that employer should have presumed that a 10 month delay by the Board was a deemed denial of its supersedeas request
  • violations of the Act with respect to prompt payment of compensation exist independently of merits
  • violations of the Act with respect to prompt payment of compensation exist independently of merits
  • despite delay by Board in denying supersedeas request, the employer should have regarded the request as a denial and honored its obligation to pay compensation thereby insuring its eligibility for a refund from the Supersedeas Fund upon ultimate success
  • 10-month delay is tantamount to a deemed denial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.