Skip to main content
· 10/8/1991

Fineman v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 774 F. Supp. 225
  • 1991 WL 185794

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying New Jersey law to New Jersey resident’s claim of tortious interference with prospective economic advantage
  • “The relevant time period on the question of monopoly power . . . is the time at which [the defendant] allegedly acted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bissell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.