Skip to main content
· 3/14/1994

Finegold v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.

Citations

  • 202 A.D.2d 469
  • 610 N.Y.S.2d 796
  • 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Texas courts have held that a series of emails established an agreement that satisfied Rule 11
  • noting that Rule 11 agreement may be formed with series of writings such as emails
  • finding that an email agreement satisfied Rule 11's “in writing” requirement
  • finding that an email agreement satisfied Rule 11’s “in writing” requirement
  • finding that an email agreement satisfied Rule 11’s “in writing” requirement
  • finding that an email agreement satisfied Rule 11's “in writing” requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.