· 7/30/2001
Finegan v. County of Los Angeles
Citations
- 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 762
- 91 Cal. App. 4th 1
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6467
- 12 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 42
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 7893
- 2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 590
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The quo warranto procedure satisfies constitutional due process for 9 remedying any claimed procedural irregularities leading to the City Council’s declaration of a 10 vacancy in appellant’s office.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Willhite
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.