Fine v. Firestone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that citizen initiative violated constitutional single-subject requirement and affirming removal from ballot
• \[T]he one-subject limitation deal[s] with a logical and natural oneness of purpose. . . .\
• \The purpose of the single-subject requirement is to ... avoid voters having to accept part of a proposal which they oppose in order to obtain a change which they support.\
• \The purpose of the single-subject requirement is to . . . avoid voters having to accept part of a proposal which they oppose in order to obtain a change which they support.\
• “[T]he one-subject limitation deal[s] with a logical and natural oneness of purpose .... ”
• “[T]he one-subject limitation deal[s] with a logical and natural oneness of purpose .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).