Fine v. Fine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that where there is no transcript of an evidentiary hearing, this Court will presume that evidence was presented to support the trial court’s ruling
• explaining that “[a]pplying the presumption of the trial court’s faithful and lawful performance of its duties, . . . [and] in the absence of a transcript,” the trial court’s ruling on a matter was correct
• explaining that where there is no transcript of an evidentiary hearing, this Court will presume evidence supported the trial court’s actions because there was no transcript of the proceedings, see Spurlock v. Dept. of Human Resources, 286 Ga. 512, 515 (690 SE2d 378) (2010
• it is the duty of the party asserting error to show it by the record
• it is the duty of the party asserting error to show it hy the record
• discussing waiver of right to jury trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).