Skip to main content
· 6/13/1996

Fine Line, Inc. v. Blake

Citations

  • 677 A.2d 1061
  • 1996 Me. LEXIS 147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even a right of way 'for all purposes' does not automatically include the right to install utility lines.
  • holding that even a ROW 'for all purposes' does not automatically include the right to install utility lines and remanding the case so that the trial court may determine the original parties’ intended purpose for the ROW.
  • deed granting right of way “fifty feet in width” did not necessarily include right to install utility lines; trial court must look to circumstances at the time of conveyance, such as type of use of the property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wathen, Roberts, Glassman, Clifford, Dana, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.