Skip to main content
· 12/5/1986

Fine Foods, Inc. v. Dahlin

Citations

  • 523 A.2d 1228
  • 147 Vt. 599
  • 1986 Vt. LEXIS 465

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, in deciding reasonableness of fees, courts must consider “the usual prices charged by other attorneys for similar services in the same vicinity and in the same court”
  • “Determining what would be a reasonable fee in a particular matter is ordinarily a question of fact.”
  • noting there is no fixed standard for determining a reasonable rate and listing factors to be considered, including prices charged by other attorneys for similar services and in the same vicinity
  • rejecting an award of attorney's fees when plaintiff failed to introduce evidence of reasonableness, and observing that \[e]vidence of this sort was not available to the court in the instant case because none was admitted\
  • noting there is no fixed standard for determining a reasonable rate and listing factors to be considered, including prices charged by other attorneys for similar services and in the same vicinity
  • rejecting an award of attorney’s fees when plaintiff failed to introduce evidence of reasonableness, and observing that “[ejvidence of this sort was not available to the court in the instant case because none was admitted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Hill, Peck, Gibson, Barney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.