Findley v. Findley (In Re Findley)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that debtor-husband’s hold harmless obligation was not excepted from discharge under § 523(a)(5
• “each party’s projected income should be measured by his or her realistic earning potential, not by lifestyle or other choices which restrict income”
• “each party’s projected income should be measured by his or her realistic earning potential, not by lifestyle or other choices which restrict income”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).