Findlay v. Pruitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that special master properly found that expert was not qualified to testify that petitioner suffered from a demyelinating disease when he had never practiced neurology or neuroimmunology
• affirming a special master’s finding that petitioner’s expert was not “capable of offering an expert opinion on an alleged neuroimmunological disorder” when the expert had never practiced neurology
• affirming a special master’s finding that petitioner’s expert was not “capable of offering an expert opinion on an alleged neuroimmunological disorder” when the expert had never practiced neurology

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).