Findlay v. David B. Findlay, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the summary suspension of a business license violated due process, “especially in view of the fact that defendants have made no showing that a predeprivation hearing was impracticable or impossible”
• rejecting qualified immunity for defendants who had suspended a business license without a predeprivation hearing
• law making retaliation for the exercise of a constitutional right actionable under § 1983 has been established for some time, and an objectively reasonable official could not fail to know of it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).