Finch v. Hull

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that public employee who had been dismissed for cause was entitled to \retirement\ benefits
• holding that employee who had \complied with all conditions necessary\ to receive benefits \cannot be affected adversely by subsequent legislation which changes the terms of the retirement contract\
• holding that public employee who had been dismissed for cause was entitled to \retirement\ benefits
• holding that public. employee who had been dismissed for cause was entitled to \retirement\ benefits
• holding that employee who had \complied with all conditions necessary\ to receive benefits \cannot be affected adversely by subsequent legislation which changes the terms of the retirement contract\
• holding that employee who had “complied with all conditions necessary” to receive benefits “cannot be affected adversely by subsequent legislation which changes the terms of the retirement contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).