Skip to main content
· 11/27/2007

Finch v. Earl

Citations

  • 935 A.2d 172
  • 104 Conn. App. 515
  • 2007 Conn. App. LEXIS 426

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that, despite missing exhibits, record provided adequate basis for appellate court to review claims raised on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dipentima, Gruendel, Borden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.