Financial Center Associates of East Meadow, L.P. v. TNE Funding Corp. (In Re Financial Center Associates of East Meadow, L.P.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[s]light differences in formulating similar formulas will, over long periods of time and when applied to large sums of money, result in pre-payment charges of great disparity”
• rejecting Kroh Bros, and concluding that a 25% charge was high but not unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).