FINANCE CORPORATION v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing with the court in Davis v. American National Bank of Denver, 149 Colo. 34, 37, 367 P.2d 325, 326 (1961), that, for the purposes of unlawful conversion, demand and refusal are superfluous when \the cireumstances are sufficient to prove the conversion\
• agreeing with the court in Davis v. American National Bank of Denver , 149 Colo. 34, 37, 367 P.2d 325, 326 (1961), that, for the purposes of unlawful conversion, demand and refusal are superfluous when “the circumstances are sufficient to prove the conversion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).