Finan v. Finan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[i]n the absence of a showing that the [excluded] evidence would have affected the final result, its exclusion is harmless’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Wilmington Trust, National Assn. v. N'Guessan
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2022-08-02

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Small v. South Norwalk Savings Bank
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-01-12· cited 65×
• Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Board of Tax Review
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-22· cited 58×
• Kalams v. Giacchetto
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-03-23· cited 42×
• Connor v. Statewide Grievance Committee
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-06-04· cited 38×
• Alvord Investment, LLC v. Zoning Board of Appeals
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-05-15· cited 37×
• Thalheim v. Town of Greenwich
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-07-17· cited 28×
• Histen v. Histen
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-12-19· cited 21×
• Finan v. Finan
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-04-03· cited 13×
• Finan v. Finan
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-06-05· cited 2×