Skip to main content
· 12/18/2003

Finagin v. Arkansas Development Finance Authority

Citations

  • 139 S.W.3d 797
  • 355 Ark. 440
  • 2003 Ark. LEXIS 684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that courts are not restricted to the literal language of the contract and will consider the facts and circumstances surrounding the execution of the release to determine the intent of the parties
  • noting that courts are not restricted to the literal language of the contract and will consider the facts 9. In Benedek v. PLC Santa Monica, LLC, 129 Cal. Rptr. 2d 197 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002
  • when a party seeking relief fails to obtain a ruling on the specific issue, the appellate court is precluded from reviewing the issue on appeal
  • “An exculpatory contract is one in which a party seeks to absolve himself in advance for the consequences of his own negligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ray Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.