Fina Supply, Inc. v. Abilene National Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that despite general rule misrepresentations involving legal points are to be considered factual misrepresentations if they were so intended and understood
• holding that statements as to legal effect of amending expiration date of letter of credit could not support fraud claim
• recognizing that despite general rule misrepresentations involving legal points are to be considered factual misrepresentations if they were so intended and understood
• recognizing that despite general rule misrepresentations involving legal points are to be considered factual misrepresentations if they were so intended and understood
• stating that the election doctrine is not favored, and its scope should not be extended
• noting that generally, ―[a] representation as to the legal effect of a document is regarded as a statement of opinion rather than of fact‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).