Filush v. Town of Weston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the legislative heading for “Title II, ‘Public Services,’ suggests that it was intended to pertain only to the provision of public services”
• noting that “[s]ome courts have held that the second clause is independent from the first and that it prohibits any form of discrimination by a public entity” (emphasis in original)
• finding that personnel and equipment providing public education, transportation, or law enforcement are not services within Title II of the ADA
• noting that the second clause “appears to relate back to the same services, programs, and activities of a public entity that the first clause covers” (alterations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting the impractical result of allowing public employees to “circumvent the administrative procedures required under Title I”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).