District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/27/1999
Fillyaw v. State
Citations
- 734 So. 2d 1136
- 1999 WL 332699
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant failed to preserve a restitution issue by contemporaneously objecting or filing a rule 3.800(b) motion
- stating that a sentencing error must be preserved either by a contemporaneous objection or by a motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-01· cited 43×
- Locke v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-21· cited 28×
- Middleton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-22· cited 28×
- Lorenzana v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-09· cited 2×
- Velez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-17· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.