Fillmore v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• argument that award of zero damages went to weight of the evidence and did not require a contemporaneous objection beforé the jury is discharged
• where uncontradicted medical evidence shows compensable injury, jury award of zero warranted new trial
• “[I]n order to preserve an issue for appellate review, a party must make a timely and specific objection at the appropriate stage of the proceedings before the trial court.”
• “On appeal, the Superior Court will not consider a claim which was not called to the trial court’s attention at a time when any error committed could have been corrected.”
• where a verdict is problematic, but not inconsistent, a party’s failure to object to the verdict prior to the jury’s dismissal by the trial court judge does not result in the issue’s waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).