Filko v. Filko

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing substitution at the time a divorce decree was to be entered was not an abuse of discretion where settlement decree had been agreed upon and all that was required to conclude the matter was entry of the written decree
• where a party already consented to terms of settlement in open court, that party cannot change their consent merely by changing attorneys

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).