Filion v. New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that reliance on a “stipulated . . . blanket 5 protective order” does not justify sealing court records
• stating that \wrongfully admitted evidence must be 'quantitatively assessed in the context of other evidence presented'\
• “[T]he defendant’s purchases for personal use are relevant in determining the quantity of drugs that the defendant knew were distributed by the conspiracy.”
• \[C]ourts that have approved the 'buyer-seller' instruction have restricted its use to cases in which the evidence showed only a single or a very limited number of sales for personal use.\
• noting a \hazy\ line between legitimate argument and improper vouching
• discussing declaration against interest exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).