Filer v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “there is no question that the new constitutional rule . . . articulated in Atkins is retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review”
• holding that Atkins applied retroactively on federal habeas review, no matter when the sentence was imposed
• holding that “there is no question that the new constitutional rule . . . articulated in Atkins is retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review”
• holding that “there is no question that the new constitutional rule . . . articulated in Atkins is retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review”
• granting eleventh hour application for leave to file a second habeas petition and stay of execution
• holding that Atkins applies retroactively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).