Filebark v. United States Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that this preemption of judicial review applies “even when that scheme pro- vides no judicial relief”
• examining, pursuant to Block v. Community Nutrition Institute, 467 U.S. at 345 , 104 S.Ct. 2450 , 81 L.Ed.2d 270 (1984
• noting district court “was free to reconsider” a motion under 54(b)’s permissive scheme
• “[The D.C. Circuit has] long held that federal employees may not use the [APA] to challenge agency employment actions.” (collecting cases)
• “[W]e have held that [the CSRA’s] comprehensive employment scheme preempts judicial review under the more general APA even when that scheme provides no judicial relief.”
• “Congress, through the [CSRA] . . . (codified as amended in scattered sections of 5 U.S.C.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).