Skip to main content
· 10/3/1991

File v. D & L LANDFILL, INC.

Citations

  • 579 N.E.2d 1228
  • 219 Ill. App. 3d 897
  • 162 Ill. Dec. 414
  • 1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 1722

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that conditions placed on site approval help to minimize incompatibility with surrounding area and, thus, the Pollution Board’s finding that the criterion was met was not against the manifest weight of the evidence
  • finding that conditions placed on site approval help to minimize incompatibility with surrounding area and, thus, the Pollution Board’s finding that the criterion was met was not against the manifest weight of the evidence
  • finding that conditions placed on site approval help to minimize incompatibility with surrounding area and, thus, the Pollution Board's finding that the criterion was met was not against the manifest weight of the evidence
  • “standard of review to be exercised by both the Pollution Control Board and this court is whether, respectively, the decisions of the county board and the Pollution Control Board are contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence”
  • “standard of review to be exercised by both the Pollution Control Board and this court is whether, respectively, the decisions of the county board and the Pollution Control Board are contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Welch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.