Filbrun v. Ivers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that any error in admitting victim’s prior consistent statement was harmless where it was merely cumulative of testimony of physician who examined victim shortly after attack
• evidence cumulative where it was substantially similar to other evidence introduced by State

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).