Fikiri Lusingo v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that factual findings related to petitioner’s eligibility for asylum are evaluated under substantial evidence standard
• characterizing “well-founded fear of future persecution” as having both a subjective and objective component
• characterizing “well-founded fear of future persecution” as having both a subjective and objective component
• “When deficiencies in the BIA’s decision make it impossible for us to meaningfully review its decision, we must vacate that decision and remand so that the BIA can further explain its reasoning.” (quoting Kayembe v. Ashcroft, 334 F.3d 231, 238 (3d Cir. 2003))
• “When deficiencies in the BIA’s decision make it impossible for us to meaningfully review its decision, we must vacate that decision and remand so that the BIA can further explain its reasoning.” (quoting Kayembe v. Ashcroft, 334 F.3d 231, 238 (3d Cir. 2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).