Figueroa v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion for interlocutory appeal because the movant “has failed to demonstrate that at least two courts interpret this legal principle differently.”
• noting “any order granting partial disposition of an adversary proceeding is not final in the absence of strict compliance” with Rule 54(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).