Skip to main content
· 2/11/2011

Figueroa v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department

Citations

  • 633 F.3d 1129
  • 394 U.S. App. D.C. 232
  • 78 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1045
  • 17 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 371
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3168
  • 2011 WL 476624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that FLSA claims accrue each time there is a failure to pay earned overtime pay
  • holding that failure to pay overtime in one pay period represents a discrete cause of action that does not become a continuing violation merely because it occurred each pay period
  • characterizing essential elements as “that [employee] has performed work for which he was improperly compensated”
  • “On appeal, the officers challenge only one aspect of the district court’s decision: its conclusion that their FLSA overtime claim[][is] time-barred.”
  • “each violation gives rise to a new cause of action, each [cause of action] begins a new statute of limitations period” (quoting Knight v. Columbus, 19 F.3d 579, 582 (11th Cir. 1994))
  • “[A]n employee has carried out his burden [in an FLSA action] if he proves that he has in fact performed work for which he was improperly compensated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Rogers, Garland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.