· 5/15/2015
Fight Against Brownsburg Annexation v. Town of Brownsburg, Indiana
Citations
- 32 N.E.3d 798
- 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 402
- 2015 WL 2328736
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding alleged defect in annexation remonstrance signatures did not affect subject matter jurisdiction of trial court to consider remonstrance petition
- explaining that, although a court has subject matter jurisdiction over a given issue, the parties must still satisfy certain procedural prerequisites to state a claim
- holding alleged defect in annexation Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 20A-PL-177 | June 16, 2020 Page 9 of 10 remonstrance signatures did not affect subject matter jurisdiction of trial court to consider remonstrance petition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Friedlander, Najam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.