Skip to main content
· 5/15/2015

Fight Against Brownsburg Annexation v. Town of Brownsburg, Indiana

Citations

  • 32 N.E.3d 798
  • 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 402
  • 2015 WL 2328736

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding alleged defect in annexation remonstrance signatures did not affect subject matter jurisdiction of trial court to consider remonstrance petition
  • explaining that, although a court has subject matter jurisdiction over a given issue, the parties must still satisfy certain procedural prerequisites to state a claim
  • holding alleged defect in annexation Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 20A-PL-177 | June 16, 2020 Page 9 of 10 remonstrance signatures did not affect subject matter jurisdiction of trial court to consider remonstrance petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Friedlander, Najam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.