Figgie International, Inc. v. Fred W. Bailey, James Upfield, Travelers Ins. Co., and Insurance Co. Of North America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• summary judgment appropriate where insured “failed to submit any evidence” that hazardous material located on insured’s property was capable of leaking into groundwater
• coverage denied where plaintiff failed to show either actual or threatened third-party property damage
• coverage denied where plaintiff failed to show either actual or threatened third-party property damage
• “The Social Security Act does not require that 26 claimants be utterly incapacitated to be eligible for benefits, and many home 27 activities may not be easily transferable to a work environment where it might be 28 impossible to rest periodically or take medication.”
• “The Social Security Act does not require that 26 claimants be utterly incapacitated to be eligible for benefits, and many home 27 activities may not be easily transferable to a work environment where it might be 28 impossible to rest periodically or take medication.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).