Fierst v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a reasonable officer could not conclude that there were reasonable grounds for believing licensee was under the influence while driving, given one-hour time lapse between accident and when licensee was found drinking at his home
• where there was no reasonable suspicion when the officer’s obser vations of Fierst had taken place approximately one hour after the accident, at his home, with a bottle of beer in his hand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McCallum v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-06-04· cited 35×
• Hasson v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-01-25· cited 34×
• Polinsky v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-02-01· cited 27×
• Stahr v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-03-31· cited 14×
• Demarchis v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-06-29· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Hall
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-10-13· cited 3×
• Commonwealth v. Pasquariello
  Carbon County Court of Common Pleas· 1992-03-19
• J.P. Parrish v. PennDOT, Bureau of Driver Licensing
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-07-08

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Dreisbach
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-08-27· cited 78×
• Commonwealth v. Ferrara
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-05-30· cited 19×
• Corry v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-05-28· cited 15×