Skip to main content

Fields v. State

Citations

  • 390 S.E.2d 71
  • 194 Ga. App. 149
  • 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 38

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a proffer of what the excluded evidence would have shown is necessary to afford a basis for an assertion of error
  • because child was found competent to testify at trial and was available to testify at trial, court did not err in allowing hearsay testimony about the victim’s account of the alleged abuses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sognier, Banke, Pope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.