Skip to main content
· 8/5/2011

Fields v. Smith

Citations

  • 653 F.3d 550
  • 89 A.L.R. 6th 841
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16152
  • 2011 WL 3436875

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Refusing to provide effective treatment for a serious medical condition serves no valid penological purpose and amounts to torture.\
  • accepting, in the absence of contrary evidence, expert testimony that \psychotherapy as well as antipsychotics and antidepressants . . . do nothing to treat the underlying disorder [of GID]\
  • upholding the District Court’s invalidation of Wisconsin statute that created a blanket ban on hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery for inmates with GID
  • “Refusing to provide effective treatment for a serious medical condition serves no valid penological pur- pose and amounts to torture.”
  • enforcement of Wisconsin statute preventing prison officials from dispensing hormone therapy to transgender inmates constituted deliberate indifference to transgender inmates’ serious medical needs, and statute facially violated the Eighth Amendment
  • ―‗Sexual reassignment surgery‘ means surgical procedures to alter a person‘s physical appearance so that the person appears more like the opposite gender.‖ (quoting the Wisconsin Inmate Sex Change Prevention Act, WIS. STAT. § 302.386(5m) (2010))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rovner, Wood, Gottschall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.