· 8/5/2011
Fields v. Smith
Citations
- 653 F.3d 550
- 89 A.L.R. 6th 841
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16152
- 2011 WL 3436875
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \Refusing to provide effective treatment for a serious medical condition serves no valid penological purpose and amounts to torture.\
- accepting, in the absence of contrary evidence, expert testimony that \psychotherapy as well as antipsychotics and antidepressants . . . do nothing to treat the underlying disorder [of GID]\
- upholding the District Court’s invalidation of Wisconsin statute that created a blanket ban on hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery for inmates with GID
- “Refusing to provide effective treatment for a serious medical condition serves no valid penological pur- pose and amounts to torture.”
- enforcement of Wisconsin statute preventing prison officials from dispensing hormone therapy to transgender inmates constituted deliberate indifference to transgender inmates’ serious medical needs, and statute facially violated the Eighth Amendment
- ―‗Sexual reassignment surgery‘ means surgical procedures to alter a person‘s physical appearance so that the person appears more like the opposite gender.‖ (quoting the Wisconsin Inmate Sex Change Prevention Act, WIS. STAT. § 302.386(5m) (2010))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rovner, Wood, Gottschall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.