Fields v. Mersack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “it is a factual question whether a personal representative has acted in good faith and with just cause in defending or prosecuting a caveat proceeding”
• noting that “The plain language of the statute [§ 7-603] makes clear ... that a personal representative may not receive ‘necessary expenses and disbursements from the estate’ unless he or she ‘defends or prosecutes a proceeding in good faith and with just cause’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).