New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 6/17/1977
Fielder Agency v. Eldan Construction Corp.
Citations
- 377 A.2d 1220
- 152 N.J. Super. 344
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that “injury to a defendant’s reputation for financial responsibility in the operation of its business” is not “such special damage sufficient to sustain a cause of action” for malicious prosecution or malicious use of process
- finding that “injury to a defendant’s reputation for financial responsibility in the operation of its business” is not “such special damage sufficient to sustain a cause of action” for malicious prosecution or malicious use of process
- essential elements of abuse of process are an ulterior motive and some further act after issuance of process showing the perversion of its legitimate use
- essential elements of abuse of process are an ulterior motive and some further act after issuance of process showing the perversion of its legitimate use
- damage to plaintiff's business reputation for financial responsibility insufficient
- damage to plaintiffs business reputation for financial responsibility insufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gaynor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa· 1978-06-28· cited 98×
- Fleming v. UPSNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-01-22· cited 32×
- Simone v. Golden Nugget Hotel & CasinoThird Circuit· 1988-04-20· cited 29×
- SBK Catalogue Partnership v. Orion Pictures Corp.D. New Jersey· 1989-09-13· cited 23×
- Venuto v. Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecchi & Stewart, P.C.Third Circuit· 1993-11-30· cited 22×
- Evans v. Prudential Property and Casualty Ins.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-05-05· cited 16×
- Ackerman v. LaganoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1979-12-19· cited 14×
- Giri v. Rutgers Cas. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-05-24· cited 13×
- Brien v. LomazowNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1988-08-04· cited 12×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1988-04-20· cited 10×
- Galbraith v. Lenape Regional High School DistrictD. New Jersey· 1997-05-16· cited 8×
- Ralph Venuto v. Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecchi & Stewart, P.C.Third Circuit· 1993-11-30
- Baratta v. Deer Haven, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2011-09-08
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1951-08-10· cited 98×
- Penwag Property Co., Inc. v. LandauNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-03-16· cited 40×
- Gambocz v. APELNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1968-07-12· cited 27×
- State Ex Rel. Stanley v. LujanNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1939-08-21· cited 26×
- Aalfs v. AalfsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1954-09-21· cited 24×
- Johnson v. Walker-Smith Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1943-10-21· cited 16×
- State v. MeyerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1878-06-15· cited 8×
- Gambocz v. ApelSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1968-09-17· cited 7×
- Soffos v. EatonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1944-11-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.