Field v. Alexander & Alexander of Indiana, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “any customer,” in the absence of explicit language to the contrary, should be confined to the employer’s customers when the employee was terminated
• holding that the term “any customer,” in the absence of explicit Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 71A04-1512-PL-2154 | August 11, 2016 Page 18 of 21 language to the contrary, should be confined to the employer’s customers when the employee was terminated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).