Fidler v. Central Cooperative Bank (In Re Fidler)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because TILA was the model on which [M]CCCDA was based, federal court decisions construing TILA are instructive in construing parallel provisions of [M]CCCDA”
• CCCDA designed “to assure a meaningful disclosure of credit terms” and protect against inaccurate and unfair credit billing
• recoupment claim in bankruptcy context requires that: “(1) the TILA [or MCCCDA] violation and the creditor’s debt arose from the same transaction, (2) [the claimant] is asserting her claim as a defense, and (3) the main action is timely” [quotations omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).