Fidenas AG v. Honeywell Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• fact that defendants procured loans for subsidiary was “common” and not grounds for piercing the veil
• fact that parent approved subsidiary expenditures over a certain level did not support piercing
• parent company reporting subsidiary’s profits as its own insufficient to pierce the corporate veil.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).