Fidelity Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Archer
Citations
- 179 F. 32
- 103 C.C.A. 16
- 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5003
Syllabus
<p>Corporations (§ 259*) — Jurisdiction—Adequate Remedy at Law — Preventing Multiplicity of Suits — Suits by Receiver Against Stockholders.</p> <p>A federal court of equity is without jurisdiction of a suit by the receiver of an insolvent corporation against numerous stockholders to enforce payment of an assessment of a fixed sum per share on its stock, made by authority of a court in another jurisdiction in a suit to wind up the affairs of the corporation to which suit the defendant stockholders were not individually parties, either on the ground of preventing a multiplicity of suits, or on the ground that it is ancillary to the main suit, where it does not appear that there is any ground of defense common to the defendants, and the bill does not pray for any equitable relief, but merely seeks to collect from each defendant a definite sum as the assessment against his stock.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Corporations, Cent. Dig. §§ 1059-1067; Dec. Dig. § 259.*</p> <p>Stockholders’ liability to creditors in equity, see notes to Rickerson Roller-Mill Co. v. Farrell Foundry Co., 23 C. C. A. 315; Scott v. Latimer, 33 C. C. A. 23.]</p>
Judges: Bradford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Carey v. McMillanEighth Circuit· 1923-04-23· cited 25×
- Hollander v. HeaslipFifth Circuit· 1915-03-24· cited 13×
- Clinton Mining & Mineral Co. v. CochranThird Circuit· 1918-01-17· cited 10×
- Lake Charles Rice Milling Co. v. Pacific Rice Growers' Ass'nNinth Circuit· 1924-01-21· cited 9×
- Keehn v. StapletonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1946-06-08· cited 5×
- Britton v. AndrewsEighth Circuit· 1925-09-30· cited 2×
- Yuba Consolidated Gold Fields v. KilkearyN.D. California· 1952-02-05· cited 1×
- Brown v. AllebachU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania· 1910-10-26· cited 1×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1869-12-13· cited 297×
- Casey v. GalliSupreme Court· 1877-03-26· cited 241×
- Hale v. AllinsonSupreme Court· 1903-01-19· cited 215×
- White v. EwingSupreme Court· 1895-06-03· cited 153×
- Flash v. ConnSupreme Court· 1883-11-26· cited 128×
- Terry v. TubmanSupreme Court· 1876-03-20· cited 58×
- Bailey v. TillinghastSixth Circuit· 1900-02-12· cited 41×
- Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. CaffreyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri· 1904-03-19· cited 14×
- Hale v. AllinsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania· 1900-06-11· cited 10×
- Pennsylvania Co. v. BayU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois· 1906-09-19· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.