Fidelity National Bank v. Tommy L. Goff, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the answer to a complaint contained the “affirmative defense” of unconscionability
• stating that the answer to a complaint contained the “affirmative defense” of unconscionability
• moving party carries the burden to show no genuine issue of material fact as to affirmative defenses in the pleadings of party responding to motion for summary judgment
• moving party carries the burden to show no genuine issue of material fact as to affirmative defenses in the pleadings of party responding to motion for summary judgment
• summary judgment should not be used as a substitute for trial
• referring to the “affirmative defense” of unconscionability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).