Skip to main content
· 3/15/1984

Fidelity National Bank v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Citations

  • 584 F. Supp. 1039
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that should the insurer proceed under a claim for subrogation, it was clear that the “third-party demand having been filed more than a year after the discovery of the loss, has prescribed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John v. Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.