Fidelity Financial Corporation v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, Milton Feinerman, President of the Federal Home Loan Bank of S.F.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that once “the court has already given the plaintiff an opportunity 27 to amend his complaint” on the same point, the “district court’s discretion to deny leave to 28 [further] amend is particularly broad”
• noting that when 20 “the court has already given the plaintiff an opportunity to amend his complaint” on the 21 same point, the “district court’s discretion to deny leave to [further] amend is particularly 22 broad”
• refusing to allow plaintiff to file a fourth amended complaint where “[t]he factual bases of the claims were known to [plaintiff] long before” and the defendant would have been prejudiced
• upholding denial of leave to amend where “[t]he factual 12 bases of the claims were known to [a plaintiff] long before”
• noting 16 that when “the court has already given the plaintiff an opportunity to amend his complaint” 17 on the same point, the “district court’s discretion to deny leave to [further] amend is 18 particularly broad”
• “The district court’s discretion to deny leave to amend is particularly broad where the court has already given the plaintiff an opportunity to amend his complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).